Darwin’s Theory of Evolution Fails to Provide Evidence for Causative Agency

1. Homology may infer evolution but provides no evidence for                                causative agency.

                   2. The fossil record may infer evolution but provides no evidence for                              causative agency.

                   3. Missing links may infer evolution but provide no evidence for                               causative agency.

                   4. Embryology may infer evolution but provides no evidence for                               causative agency.

                   5. DNA and the double helix may infer evolution but provide no                                         evidence for causative agency.

                   6. Enzymes and proteins may infer evolution but provide no evidence                                 for causative agency.

                   7. The molecular clock may infer evolution but provides no evidence                                  for causative agency.

          Not a single step in the  generation of functional enzymes has been shown to have an exclusively natural causation.

          No aspect of a Darwinian evolution provides any evidence for causative agency. Causative agency is always indeterminate.

          Causative agency could be natural. It could be supernatural.

However, causative agency can be inferred by a philosophical appeal to the best solution. Sound reasoning and empirical evidence strongly support a supernatural agency as the causative agency (See Articles three through eight).

                                                                                Fredric P. Nelson, MD   © 2025